gowrite.net

For me, 2 new commands would suffice. The first command is mirror downward diagonal for the whole board The second command is mirror upward diagonal for the whole board (For the sake of completition, 2 more commands for selected areas might be added, then you get 4 new commands.) I am writing joseki...

Using GW2.2, I opened GW once and it had the right windows size (I maximize the Window by dragging it to the srceen edges since the desktop symbol Maximize function does not work, presumably because of JRE), then I opened a second instance of GW and it had a small windows size, then I closed the sec...

Currently I find myself repeatedly doing 2 successive translations and guessing which I might need. What I do need is mirroring along a board diagonal. Either that one downwards or that one upwards. So I suggest two new commands:

mirror downward diagonal
mirror upward diagonal

Actually, there are two standard ways in Windows to store settings. One is the default path, which depends on the Windows version. The other is the registry. However, the registry is actually something that applications should not use at all; it is nasty; saving settings from there is nasty. For Vis...

Currently I use OpenOffice 3 + GW 2.2 to create documents and PDF files as follows: I write the document in OpenOffice and insert tables. In every table cell, I put a go diagram. This gives good layout regardless of whether the table has borders. (Only for very large tables, OpenOffice is still a bi...

Running GW 2_2_21 at integrity level Low: The solution is simpler than I feared. At least so far the following works, where \GoWriteDIr is the name of your GW directory and MyUserName is the name of your Windows user, it is a standard user, and you do it for every user with that you use GW: ********...

I can think of only one other reason: legacy code in Java that accidentally becomes active by GoWrite's calls of the Java libraries. Which other reasons can you imagine? It might help me to search if I know what to search for.

How to read the stack trace for system calls?

OC, you cannot have every operating system at home... At least, I think, you should be able to answer questions 1, 4, 5, and 7 because you can know what GoWrite is supposed to access at all. Some months later, when I will have time, I will make make further research into the topic to hopefully get G...

For Vista Ultimate 32b and GW2_2_21, so far I could log these accesses. Note that (CI)(OI) means "access also to containers or objects (i.e., folders or files, subkeys or keys' data) further below the tree". I do not mention such access that is obviously initiated by Windows or is specific...

For Vista Ultimate 32b and GW2_2_21, I have tested access a bit. I have noticed that the following files and registry keys were not found. Note that (CI)(OI) means "access also to containers or objects (i.e., folders or files, subkeys or keys' data) further below the tree". Attempt by GOWr...

If GW is set to Low integrity level together with NoReadUp, then it may not read Medium registry keys. To achieve such a setting, I have started some testing; see other threads. I need more information though before I can try Low.

Here is some more specific information on apparently needed indirect access / process: Allow send_message from GoWrite.exe to GoWrite.exe. I am still testing whether send_message or write_to_other_application's_memory are needed for javaw.exe. However, the above rule is already a great restriction: ...

I use GW 2.1.24 and Vista Ultimate 32b. As a quick test suggests, GW can be set to the Integrity Level Low if these directories (inherited) are set to Low as well: <path>\Program Files\GoWrite2 <path>\Program Files\Java <path>\Program Files\Common Files\Java As a consequence, GW is like in a sandbox...

>> would know that messages do not indicate attempt in network activity << I am aware that indirect access to another program is not network activity yet. It requires a process chain program M -> indirect communication -> program N -> (etc.) -> access to network -> outbound communication >> In short...

Ok, thank you for your answer and reasoning! This makes sense. (Except that one might offer a GUI parameter of how many seconds the process shall wait for termination.) Do you also know which types of indirect "network" processes (see the other thread) are responsible for non-termination o...